Review
Reflect
Claire Kramsch (1993: 179) presents a strong argument in favor of developing metalinguistic awareness of the type that leads second language learners to become critical thinkers as they go about analyzing L2 data:
"Authentic speech is often presented and read in language classes in the same uncritical way as such language is used by most native speakers - as if the classroom could ever be, or even should try to imitate, the natural environment of restaurants and workplaces."
To what extent does Kramsch's argument above set up a competition for resources (e.g., class time) to develop metalinguistic awareness as a critical thinking endeavor versus the development of linguistic skills (i.e., encyclopedic and interactional levels)?